In 2011 the University of San Diego’s psychology department researched the way readers react to stories where the end is revealed at the beginning.“Subjects significantly preferred the spoiled versions of ironic-twist stories, where, for example, it was revealed before reading that a condemned man’s daring escape is all a fantasy before the noose snaps tight around his neck…”
My maternal grandmother often reads the ending first to see if she’ll like the book. I never got that attitude, and hate having the ending given away before I’m there. I even like to cover up the last page and then slowly move the cover down as I’m reading, so the last line really will be saved for last. One of the numerous reasons I couldn’t finish or get into an extremely overrated historical novel from recent years is because the narrator kept horning into the narrative with his annoying newsflashes giving away major spoilers and the ending. Dude, thanks for giving everything away! Why should I want to read on if you’ve told me almost everyone dies?!
Take your point – now I want to know the name of that “overrated historical novel”….but historical novels do have a problem, don’t they? However much we might love Hilary Mantle’s writing, we all know Thomas Cromwell doesn’t come to a happy end…she doesn’t have the luxury of will he/won’t he.
Not a lot of suspense in a story about Anne Boleyn either….!