Are you a fan of reading challenges? 52 books in a year that kind of thing. Or do you support the call for slower, more thoughtful reading?
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
© Bridget Whelan
If you want to use any of this material contact me and there is a very good chance I will say YES.
However, if you just cut and paste into your own blog or whatever and pass it off as your own then there's a very good chance I will find out. Don't fall into the trap of thinking the internet is so vast and expanding so fast (note the fancy internal rhyme)] that no one will know.
I vote this best post of 2016. Allright, ‘so far’. This reading trend is another symptom of the need some people feel to record and ‘data-fy’ everything, accompanied by the belief that if something is not measurable it’s not worth undertaking. Phoey to all that! People need to take time to stop and smell the roses, even if they need to set an alert on their phone to remind them to do it.
Agree with you and Pam, although I suspect that’s partly because I’m naturally inclined to take life at a gentler pace….
Has anyone seen the GOODREADS 2016 Reading Challenge emails in the last 48 hours? Can you believe one person on this list called ‘Nikki’ nominates 110 books as her 2016 reading goal ? !
Inspires bad puns about where this person intends ‘nicking’ the time from to get through all that. Call me old-fashioned but I thought goals were supposed to be not only aspirational but achievable as well.
Human beings sure can be a competitive lot when they set their minds to it. Is this the literary equivalent of ‘keeping up with the Joneses’?
http://www.goodreads.com/challenges/3890?utm_content=reading_challenge_email_button&utm_medium=email&utm_source=reading_challenge_2016_1
Pingback: Reading as a competitive sport | The Proof Angel